The Best Windows ASP.NET Core 2.1.5 SSD Hosting Provider
Looking for the best ASP.NET Core 2.1.5 SSD hosting plan? Following are top recommendation based 99% existing satisfied clients feedback. We selected upon plan features, server availability, support availability and true editorial experience. Our sole purpose is to help register the best ASP.NET Core 2.1.5 SSD hosting service for your online business.
What’s New in ASP.NET Core 2.1?
Nowadays, .NET Core is in the top 5 of the most popular Frameworks, Libraries, and Tools.
The metaphor of dwarfs standing on the shoulders of giants expresses the meaning of discovering truth by building on previous discoveries and experience. The point is that the .NET team has learned from their previous experiences and .NET Core is the result of that experiences applied to a new multi-platform framework.
The framework is movin’ fast, each new release enhances and sometimes change features of the framework. The following article shows some highlights and new feature which are present in the new version of .NET Core 2.1 and ASP.NET Core 2.1.
.NET Core 2.1
The .NET team have been thinking of .NET Core 2.1 as a feedback-oriented release after the more foundational .NET Core 2.0 release. Let’s see some highlights on .NET Core 2.1:
Span<T>,Memory<T>introduction;- Windows compatibility pack;
- Build-time performance improvement;
Span , Memory introduction
.NET Core comes with a new set of types for using arrays and other types of memory that is much more efficient. Furthermore, Span<T> and Memory<T> are part of the System.Memory.dll package, the preview of this package is available on NuGet and it is compatibile with .NET Standard 1.1.
| var arr = new byte[10]; | |
| Span<byte> bytes = arr; // Implicit cast from T[] to Span<T> |
Actually, Span<T> and Memory<T> concept goes behind the consumer-use side. Indeed, these new types became useful under the hood of the framework, e.g. for the HttpClient, in order to improve the performance.
Windows compatibility pack
The Windows compatibility pack package is useful for all the developers who want to port existing .NET Framework code to .NET Core. It increases the APIs surface to an additional 20k APIs. The packages also provides some useful APIs in order to detect the hosting OS, for example:
RuntimeInformation.IsOSPlatform(OSPlatform.Windows)
Since it detects if the current OS platform is Windows, it may be useful in order to execute different code depending on the type of platform.
API Analyzer is a Roslyn analyzer that comes as NuGet package. After referencing it in your project, it automatically provides live feedback on API usage and warns about potential compatibility issues and calls to deprecated APIs.
Build-time performance improvement
The following chart provides some informations about the improvement. It compares the previous version of .NET Core with the new-one:
As you can see, in .NET 2.1 preview the build time for WebSmall project is of 2.7 sec, furthermore for the WebLarge project, the build time is 22.5 sec. The .NET team goal is to improve it with the new .NET Core 2.1 RTM version. Their plan is drop that again to 6.8 sec for WebLarge project.
ASP.NET Core 2.1
Let’s talk about ASP.NET Core 2.1. The new release is targeted for mid-year 2018. It covers some improvements and features on following areas: Razor pages, SignalR, Webhooks, Security, Perfomance, MVC, Kestrel;
Here is some highlights and new stuff from next release.
HttpClientFactory
The HttpClientFactory brings the concept of dependency injection to HttpClient implementation. It provides a central location to manage and instantiate all HttpClient.
The HttpClientFactory integrates Polly.NET. Polly is a .NET resilience and transient-fault-handling library that allows developers to express policies such as Retry, Circuit Breaker, Timeout, Bulkhead Isolation, and Fallback in a fluent and thread-safe manner.
HttpClientFactory has two different approaches: NamedClient, TypedClient;
NamedClient
The NamedClient is the default choice.
| public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services) | |
| { | |
| services.AddHttpClient(“HeadHunterAPI“, client => | |
| { | |
| client.BaseAddress = new Uri(“https://localhost:5022/“); | |
| client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add(“Accept“, “application/json“); | |
| client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add(“User-Agent“, “HttpClientFactoryTesting“); | |
| }); | |
| services.AddMvc(); | |
| } |
The method AddHttpClient defines a new namespace which can be used to refer the client inside your services and controllers:
| using System.Threading.Tasks; | |
| using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc; | |
| namespace HeadHunter.Web.Controllers | |
| { | |
| public class APIWrapperController : Controller | |
| { | |
| private readonly IHttpClientFactory _httpClientFactory; | |
| public HomeController(IHttpClientFactory httpClientFactory) | |
| { | |
| _httpClientFactory = httpClientFactory; | |
| } | |
| public Task<IActionResult> Index() | |
| { | |
| var client = _httpClientFactory.CreateClient(“HeadHunterAPI“); | |
| return Ok(await client.GetStringAsync(“/“)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
TypedClient
The other way is by referring directly the typed client. You can define a typed client by injecting the HttpClient inside the constructor of new classes, that approach, very DI oriented, is the one I prefer:
| namespace HeadHunter.Web.APIClients | |
| { | |
| public class HeadHunterAPIClient | |
| { | |
| public HeadHunterAPIClient(HttpClient client) | |
| { | |
| Client = client; | |
| } | |
| public HttpClient Client { get; } | |
| } | |
| } |
As you can see, it allows you to register and inject directly the typed client:
| public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services) | |
| { | |
| services.AddHttpClient<HeadHunterAPIClient>(client => | |
| { | |
| client.BaseAddress = new Uri(“https://localhost:5022/“); | |
| client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add(“Accept“, “application/json“); | |
| }); | |
| services.AddMvc(); | |
| } |
Kestrel: Socket over libuv
The current implementation of Kestrel uses libuv under the hood. The implementation of the underlying libuv connection semantics has been decoupled from the rest of Kestrel and abstracted away into a new Transport abstraction. By the way, for performance reasons, Microsoft is investing on custom socket implementation inside .NET. The sockets will replace the libuv async I/O.
Furthermore, it is already possible to configure and try socket transportation, to do that you should configure it on the application Program.cs:
| public static IWebHost BuildWebHost(string[] args) => | |
| WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder(args) | |
| .UseSockets() | |
| .UseStartup<Startup>() |
HTTPS
Core 2.1 comes with https by default. In other words, in addition to listing on http://localhost:5000, Kestrel will listen on https://localhost:5001when a local development certificate is present. .NET Core SDK will install a suitable certificate by default.
Why ASP.NET?
There are plenty of good reasons to use ASP.NET when developing a website or an application. High speed, low cost, and vast language support are among the most significant benefits. ASP.NET also allows a developer to choose from many different development environments, also its popularity gives a developer tons of online resources when learning new things, or troubleshooting bugs.
Websites and applications built with ASP.NET can be faster than a website build with PHP for example. ASP.NET applications are compiled, which means the code is translated into object code, which is then executed.
This is faster than code that is translated. Translated code is code that is not directly executed by the machine, but is read first then executed. Compiled code is faster than translated code, and can do anything translated code can do.
Cost is an important factor when developing a website. One of the main benefits of ASP.NET is that it is a very cost effective solution in terms of development. When setting up a site in PHP for example, you often pay for your development environment, FTP client and maybe even your database server.
If you are using WordPress, then odds are you are paying for that as well. ASP.NET on the other hand, can be developed almost entirely for free. Your development environment, FTP client, and server costs can easily be avoided. Your only cost in ASP.NET could be hosting.
ASP.NET is written using Object Oriented Programming languages such as C++, C#, or VB.net. Some would argue these languages give a developer more control or freedom over their code. There is the concern of a learning curve for languages like VB.net or C++, but for a language like C#, it is rather easy to pick up, and if you are accustomed to PHP or even Java, then C# is rather easy to pick up.
With all these benefits of ASP.NET, it’s no wonder that it would be so popular. The great thing about using a popular framework is that it’s developer community and support is well founded and easy to find. You can read tons of great guides, tips, and even meetups for asp.net across all corners of the internet with a quick google search. Also, products using asp.net are frequently updated to meet modern development standards, so you won’t fall behind in technology.
As a whole, ASP.NET is a great framework to use across the board when developing web sites, or web applications. It is reliable, fast, easy to use, and widely known. Asp.net gives you full control of your development and can easily be used on any project, big or small.
Why SSD Hosting?
Solid State Disk drives use non-volatile memory to store information. Unlike regular volatile memory (RAM), this means that the data isn’t lost when power is disconnected. Traditional drives need to spin around their platters to locate data before it can be read or modified – SSDs don’t have this issue, so seek times (the time it takes to “find” your data on the drive) are up significantly faster.
In terms of raw I/O performance, testing by Dell showed MBPS (megabits per second) of transfer under heavy load to be 2x or greater compared to enterprise class spinning drives – a single SSD can achieve the same throughput or better than a 3-disk RAID 0 array.
Particularly important for dynamic data-driven websites and those with high concurrent traffic (such as Facebook, or Twitter) is the access time – the time is takes to first locate the data area before it can be read from or written to. With HDDs, this can vary from 15-20 milliseconds (Source: NotebookCheck), SSDs cut this down to as little as 0.2 milliseconds. Clearly, in a world where shaving milliseconds off the response time of a website is critical, SSDs offer an enormous advantage.
Web Hosting Performance
The benefits of faster data access for your server software should be obvious, but are of particular importance to modern data-driven sites that dynamically generate pages from hundreds of database queries. With solid state drives, data is read and written simultaneously. Therefore, the browsing experience will significantly more pleasant thanks to the reduced loading time.
For eCommerce websites, loading speed is a huge factor: a slow website results in fewer sales. Customers get frustrated, abandoning the cart or site completely. You might think four seconds is a reasonable load time, but you’ll have already lost 25 per cent of potential customers at that point!
Even if you’re not selling anything, serving pages faster is going to increase the overall usability of your site – that means more interaction, more page views, and more ad revenue if that’s your income source.
There’s a number of third-party services, plugins and general tactics you can take to improve performance. But ultimately, there’s not a lot you can do if the core performance of your web host is simply too slow – that particular bottleneck is out of your hands. SSD hosting tackles the core of the problem, as well as enhancing any disk caching performance you would see when used alongside those plugins. The added benefits of SSD hosting will ripple through every layer of your site – file access, database queries, down to usability.
Although the difference in raw data access times compared to a regular disk drive may be measured in milliseconds, when your site is being hammered by high traffic, those milliseconds can make all the difference!
The Best Windows ASP.NET Core 2.1.5 SSD Hosting Provider
HostForLIFEASP.NET | Professional ASP.NET Core Hosting Provider & fully ASP.NET Core support. We can easily deploy the most popular ASP.NET Core, CMS & Blog system such as BlogEngine, DotNetNuke. The best ASP.NET Core hosting feature including :
- HostForLIFEASP.NET Unlimited Domain, Unlimited Disk Space, Unlimited Bandwidth only €3.00/Mo
- IIS 8.5 with URL-Rewrite, ASP.NET Core MVC Framework.
- 100% Satisfaction Promise with 30 Days Money Back Guarantee!
UKWindowsHostASP.NET | The best ASP.NET Core Hosting Provider & fully ASP.NET Core support. One of top and recommended ASP.NET Core Hosting Providers ! ASP.NET Core Hosting feature plan including:
- Unlimited Domains
- Dedicated Pool
- 99.99% Uptime Guarantee & 24/7 Live Support
- Support WordPress, Drupal and Joomla, etc
- FREE Instant Setup
ASPHostPortal.com | The top recommended ASP.NET Core Hosting Provider. Cheap and Reliable Hosting features including:
- Unlimited Sites, 5 GB Disk Space, 60 GB Bandwidth only $ 5.00/Mo
- IIS 8.5 with URL-Rewrite, ASP.NET Core MVC Framework.
- Compatible with nopCommerce, DNN, Magento and more other ASP.NET Core web applications.
- 100% Satisfaction Promise with 30 Days Money Back Guarantee!